🔗 Share this article

As any major awards ceremony nears, you'll find a clamor to include of new categories to recognize overlooked contributions and fill the passions of enthusiasts with niche passions.

A fellow writer made the case for a horror game category. It would be amazing. The same goes for board games, this being a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist for pushing forward because like all dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification for why my demand remains most pressing and significant. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that cinema institutions avoid this approach. Yet it remains a necessary evil for the industry of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify one unified medium.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to be recognized, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these award types effectively encompass many game types, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Not so for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Consider three of this year’s best games, all very different: building puzzles from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles published annually without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, if they accidentally match classification types such as Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

• A renowned logic title got overlooked for anything during that awards season
• Another imaginative release received no nominations during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title got ignored recently
• Just some brain-teasers managed to sneak into niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games stand as the most-played games worldwide and have been for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of highest-selling title ever; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones for gaming as medium, while interacting across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these represent titles that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the hard edge of video game design, producing among essential manifestations of gaming itself. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay generations.